- Super User
- Uncategorised
- Hits: 1445
Partners
|
|||||||
Óbuda University Budapest | University of Economics Bratislava |
Slovak Business Informatics Association |
REMOK foundation | Nadácia profesora Štefana Kassaya na podporu vedy a vzdelávania | |||
|
|||||||
Óbuda University Budapest | University of Economics Bratislava |
Slovak Business Informatics Association |
REMOK foundation | Nadácia profesora Štefana Kassaya na podporu vedy a vzdelávania | |||
UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS IN BRATISLAVAFACULTY OF ECONOMIC INFORMATICS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ÓBUDA UNIVERSITY BUDAPESTDONÁT BÁNKI FACULTY OF MECHANICALAND SAFETY ENGINEERING |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVITATIONNinth International Scientific Webconference of Scientists and PhD. students or candidates"Trends and Innovations in E-business, Education and Security"
Held under patronage of dean of Faculty of Economics Informatics and
of dean of Donát Bánki Faculty
The Conference will be held on May 2021
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE:
Brezina Ivan (University of Economics In Bratislava, Slovakia) Doucek Petr (University of Economics Prague, Czech Republic) Galyaev Vladimir Sergeyevich ( State Institute of IT and Telecommunications, Russia) Gontar Zbigniew (Lodz University, Poland) Kerimbaev Nurasil (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan) Kultan Jaroslav (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia) Meruert Serik (Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan) Martin Mišút (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia) Novotný Ota (University of Economics Prague, Czech Republic) Ognjanović Ivana (University of Donja Gorica, Montenegro) Panatie Maria (University of Geneva, Switzerland) Rajnai Zoltán (Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary) Rakovská Eva (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia) Reiff Marián (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia) Schmidt Peter (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia) Szabó Lajos (Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary) Zuev Vladimir (Institute for social sciences and humanities, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE:Peter Schmidt, Jaroslav Kultán, Pavol Jurík, Marian Reiff Endre Szűcs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TIEES’s Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement is based, in large part, on the guidelines and standards developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
We expect all parties commit to these publication ethics. We do not tolerate plagiarism or other unethical behavior and will remove any manuscript that does not meet these standards.
The relevant duties and expectations of authors, reviewers, and editors are set out below:
Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
Authors must notify us of any conflicts of interest.
Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
Authors must report any errors they discover in their manuscript.
Reviewers must notify us of any conflicts of interest.
Reviewers must keep information pertaining to the manuscript confidential.
Reviewers must bring to the attention of the Editors any information that may be reason to reject publication of a manuscript.
Reviewers must at any time evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify us and excuse himself from the review process.
The Editorial Board must keep information pertaining to submitted manuscripts confidential.
The Editorial Board must disclose any conflicts of interest.
The Editorial Board must evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content.
The Editorial Board is responsible for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts.